How much you raise and how much you pay yourself in salary or bonuses? Those are pretty separate things. The cash you pull in from funding is for building the biz, not stuffing your pockets. Handing yourself a bonus is a conflict of interest—definitely not something you should decide on your own. That’s for the board to handle.
Raising $10M usually means you’re in angel or Series A territory, where the company’s desperate for cash to grow. At this stage, I can’t think of any good reason a board would greenlight extra bonuses for the founder. That said, if the board agreed to a $50M post-money valuation but the CEO hustles and lands investors at a $100M valuation, that’s a big win for shareholders. If I were on the board, I wouldn’t mind tossing the CEO a bonus for doubling the company’s value. But if I were the CEO? I wouldn’t take it. True story: something like this happened to me, and I passed on the cash.
As for salaries, from what I’ve seen, founders usually take about 80% of what a professional manager in a similar-sized company would earn. Say a GM at a 10-person startup makes $40K-$50K a year—founders might take $30K-$40K, give or take. Early on, when the company’s strapped for cash, you shouldn’t be thinking about “how much can I pay myself?” but “what’s the minimum I need to scrape by?”
Once the company’s grown enough to start poaching big talent with high salaries, then founders can adjust their pay to match. For example, if you’re the CTO and a founder, and your company’s now able to hire top dogs from big tech at $100K-$120K a year, you could justify paying yourself $70K-$100K without pissing off shareholders.
Bottom line: a legit founder or co-founder shouldn’t be obsessing over how much cash they can pull out of the company right now, whether it’s through salary, bonuses, or shady backchannels. Bluntly put, if you’re fixated on that, your heart’s not in the right place. |